🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.